Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Marysville Exempted Village schools warn May 6 levy needed to avoid staff, program cuts after preschool costs shift

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Marysville Exempted Village Superintendent Diane Allen and district staff told residents the district faces a sustained budget shortfall and is asking voters to approve a 5.5-mill emergency operating levy on May 6 to avoid further cuts to staff and student programs.

Marysville Exempted Village Superintendent Diane Allen and district staff told residents the district faces a sustained budget shortfall and is asking voters to approve a 5.5-mill emergency operating levy on May 6 to avoid further cuts to staff and student programs.

The levy, the district says, is projected in its forecast to generate about $6,800,000 annually and would offset an average annual deficit the district estimates at roughly $9,000,000. "We're asking the community to consider a 5.5-mill emergency operating levy on Tuesday, May 6," Diane Allen, superintendent, said. "That would generate for us $6,800,000 annually in our forecast."

Why it matters: the district told the meeting the shortfall results from the long-term phase-out of tangible personal property (TPP) funding, a low local revenue base relative to other Ohio districts, a possible reduction in state support under the next biennial budget and a recently announced transfer of preschool costs from the Union County Board of Developmental Disabilities to the school district.

District staff said TPP funding peaked in about 2005 at more than $9,000,000 a year and has been phased out; this school year will be the last to include a small remaining TPP payment (the district estimated roughly $450,000). A district staff member identified as Todd described the projected impact of the governor’s initial biennial proposal, saying the district could lose more than $200,000 per year under that proposal compared with an earlier forecast that assumed $250,000 per year in increases.

The…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans