Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dei Funding Restrictions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves bill to codify ban on state‑funded DEI activities at colleges; debate centers on definitions and chilling effects

2901380 · April 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 796, which would codify an executive order restricting use of state resources on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) activities at higher education institutions, passed the committee after debate over definitions, carve-outs for federal funding, and whether the law could chill campus programs.

Representative Crosswhite Hater presented Senate Bill 796 and said the measure codifies an executive order that “stop[s] using state resources in relation to DEI.” The sponsor moved adoption and yielded for questions.

Representative Ransom asked how the bill squared with the previous item requiring a Title VI coordinator; Crosswhite Hater replied they were separate issues. "Because those are 2 separate issues," the sponsor said, and described the bill as clarifying existing practice that had been in place "for close to a year and a half."

Members pressed the sponsor on consequences and examples. Crosswhite Hater said the bill addressed “preferential treatment” and gave the example of student athletes being required to participate in white‑privilege training as a practice the bill would stop. The sponsor also said the measure contains a carve‑out exempting federally funded activities; when asked for specifics she pointed members to "page 3, section C."

Several members voiced concern that the bill could create a chilling effect on programs. A member referenced the University of Oklahoma's leadership program for women being curtailed after a prior executive order; the sponsor said that program's change was a university decision and not a direct result of the state action. Representative McCain urged colleagues to consider equity’s role for students with differing needs, saying, “We are not talking about extra. We are talking about people that have systemically and historically been kept out of spaces and had to work much harder.”

After one minute of debate for proponents and opponents, staff opened the vote. The committee recorded 4 ayes and 2 nays and the chair declared the bill passed.

The transcript shows the bill would: (1) codify limitations on use of state resources for DEI activities at public higher education institutions; (2) include a federal‑funding carve‑out (page 3, section C); and (3) rely on enforcement and oversight mechanisms not fully detailed in the committee discussion. The mover and second were not both named in the transcript.