Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wrongful Conviction Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill raising wrongful‑conviction compensation and adding benefits, tuition relief
Summary
House Bill 2235 would increase the amount wrongfully convicted persons can recover from the Governmental Tort Claims fund and provide health benefits and tuition waivers; sponsors said the fiscal analysis showed no direct fiscal impact but uncertainty remains about the number and size of claims.
Get email alerts on the Wrongful Conviction Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced House Bill 2235 on a unanimous recorded vote after explanation from the floor leader. The measure modifies compensation that may be recovered from the Governmental Tort Claims (GTC) fund for persons wrongfully convicted by newly available evidence or a full pardon, and authorizes health benefits and tuition waivers for the person and their children.
The floor leader, identified in the record as "Madam Floor Leader," explained the bill and responded to questions about the compensation cap. She said the bill modifies the amount that can be recovered from the GTC fund and "makes some provisions for those folks to be allowed to receive health benefits and also for those persons and their children to be able to attend college or university in the, in Oklahoma tuition free." When asked about the proposed cap, she said she intended to keep a proposal that would allow $50,000 per year (as described in the committee exchange) and that the fiscal analysis showed "no anticipated direct fiscal impact due to the solvency of any particular fund or agency as a result of this increased liability." She also said agencies had estimated potential claimant awards could be "at least $1,000,000 per claimant," but that the analysis could not predict how many people would be eligible.
Committee members had no further questions and the measure was advanced by roll call. The roll recorded 9 ayes, 0 nays and the chair declared the bill advanced. The transcript does not include the final bill text or the detailed fiscal note; committee debate focused on the scope of the changes and the sponsor’s insistence that the proposed cap was intended to remain as presented.
