Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Merit Protection Law Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee restores some grievance rights for armed law enforcement officers
Summary
House Bill 1138, a request from the Oklahoma State Troopers Association, passed the committee after members debated restoring limited avenues to contest disciplinary actions and grievances for law-enforcement officers who carry firearms; an amendment removed the Department of Corrections from the bill.
House Bill 1138, a request bill from the Oklahoma State Troopers Association, passed the Retirement and Government Affairs Committee after extended debate and a committee amendment that removed the Oklahoma Department of Corrections from the measure.
Senator Jerry Fricks, the bill sponsor, said the bill aims to restore limited rights for law-enforcement officers who carry firearms to challenge certain disciplinary actions, such as written reprimands, before an independent administrative law judge. “This bill is a request bill from the Oklahoma State Troopers Association,” Fricks said. “What we're seeking to do is add the merit protection back just for those law enforcement officers that that carry a gun.”
Evan King, an attorney with the Oklahoma State Troopers Association, told the committee the change would allow officers to contest written reprimands and some grievance outcomes in a contested administrative proceeding rather than being limited to mediation. “Currently…you cannot, really dispute a written reprimand except for mediation. You can't bring evidence and prove those things before an administrative law judge,” King said.
Committee members asked whether the change would apply more broadly to all state employees, whether it would prevent punitive reassignments, and why the Department of Corrections chose to be excluded. King and the sponsor said the proposal currently targets officers who carry firearms because of potential civil-liability consequences in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights lawsuits and the role credibility can play in later litigation.
The committee first considered and adopted a sponsor amendment that removed the Department of Corrections from the bill; the amendment was adopted by voice vote. The main motion carried on a second roll call: the clerk announced 8 ayes, 0 nays, and the chair declared House Bill 1138 passed out of committee.
Supporters argued the proposal gives officers a meaningful opportunity to clear or contest records that might later be used in civil litigation or to impede promotion. Opponents and several members pressed for clarity about scope and whether the change would create broader personnel-process rights for all state employees; the sponsor said further conversations could follow in future sessions.
The committee recorded no additional directions to staff beyond advancing the bill as amended.
