Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health And Human Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House budget cuts Medicaid rates, pauses family‑planning funding and prioritizes direct care at DHHS
Summary
Division 3 reductions include a 3% Medicaid rate cut, the removal of family‑planning appropriations that had supported four federally qualified clinics, targeted increases for Glencliff and certain developmental services, asset sales and a plan to seek recoveries and fee changes to improve Medicaid receipts.
House Finance’s Division 3 presentation focused on the Department of Health and Human Services and described substantial general‑fund reductions—roughly 10% in the first-year allocation for the division—and a mix of program protections and cuts designed to preserve direct patient care.
Division 3 leaders said the committee prioritized direct-service obligations—state-run hospitals, the Veterans Home, the Glencliff residential facility and the youth development center—and that the budget therefore preserved core staffing for corrections officers and other front-line positions while reducing administrative and nonessential lines. To close the revenue gap, the committee included several revenue-generation and cost-control measures: a 3% across‑the‑board Medicaid rate reduction, increased efforts to pursue Medicaid recoveries from estates, a small co‑pay for higher‑income Medicaid enrollees, fee increases in regulatory programs, and the sale or partial disposal of certain state properties (the Philbrook property, a Manchester house with remediation needs and surplus Hampstead campus parcels).
The presentation said family-planning grants that had supported four federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and clinics would be zeroed out in the House package. Committee presenters described the elimination as a painful choice driven by tight general-fund limits; several public commenters and committee members urged maintaining funding for geographically remote clinics or otherwise protecting sexual and reproductive health services for low‑income residents.
On developmental-disability services, the committee funded increases for children’s in‑home supports, added money for acquired brain-disorder services and moved to cover certain previously unspent administrative balances to reduce pressure on provider contracts. Lawmakers also highlighted a funding restoration for Glencliff, where the committee said earlier budgeting had omitted necessary contract/personnel flexibility and that a significant correction was required to keep the residential facility operational.
Committee presenters said the most regrettable single directive was the 3% Medicaid rate reduction and that they hoped the Senate would revisit it; they flagged the cut as the item they would most like to change. The division also reallocated some liquor fund deposits and opioid‑abatement funds and eliminated the Prescription Drug Affordability Board funding to redirect limited general funds to higher-priority direct care services.
The package includes safety-net mechanisms: the committee directed DHHS to return to the fiscal committee if certain wait-list or catastrophic-aid lines approach exhaustion so that the legislature’s fiscal-review process can consider interim replenishment.
