Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Dysart board approves retention stipend, salary increases, discipline procedure and superintendent contract
Summary
At its April 14 meeting the Dysart Governing Board approved a 3% retention stipend for eligible employees, a 2% salary increase for returning staff and revisions to student discipline procedures, and ratified a three‑year contract for Superintendent Dr. John Crodo.
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Dysart Governing Board took several formal actions at its April 14 meeting. Key outcomes:
- Retention stipend: The board approved a 3% retention stipend for employees who returned contracts or notices of employment by the district deadline and remained employed through Oct. 31, 2025. (Motion approved.)
- Salary increase: The board approved a 2% salary increase for certified, licensed, administrative and classified employees who return next year, covering the 2025–26 school year. (Motion approved.)
- Student discipline procedures: The board approved revisions to the student discipline procedures (discipline matrix). The action clarified that the board was approving the discipline matrix portion of the student and parent handbook rather than all handbook procedures. (Motion approved.)
- Superintendent contract: After an executive session, the board approved a three‑year contract for Dr. John Crodo, commencing July 1, 2025, under terms presented to the governing board. (Motion approved.)
- Consent agenda and executive session: The board approved the consent agenda as presented and later convened an executive session. Meeting minutes show motions carried; vote tallies were not recorded on the meeting transcript provided.
Motion details and procedure notes: Several motions were moved and seconded on the record and the meeting minutes indicate each motion “carries.” The transcript records the second for the consent agenda as “Seconded by Mary Jane.” Many other motions were carried without roll‑call tallies included in the public transcript excerpt.
No contested roll-call vote tallies were recorded in the transcript supplied; the board declared each motion carried by voice vote or general consent.

