Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sends farmhouse community-center fee policy back to Parks & Rec after senior-use debate
Summary
Council members debated a Parks & Recreation recommendation allowing resident seniors two free hours per week at the new farmhouse community center, then voted to send the draft fee schedule and policy back to Parks & Rec and staff for revisions and clearer language about hours, reporting and implementation.
The Oak Ridge Town Council on Dec. 5 returned the proposed facility-fee schedule and the Farmhouse Community Center policy to the Parks and Recreation Board and town staff for revisions after extended debate over hours, senior use and how the town should gather usage data.
Why it matters: Parks and Recreation had proposed a discounted package that included two free hours per week for Oak Ridge resident seniors and a set of resident and nonresident rental rates. Several residents and Parks and Rec board members supported the senior discount as a way to help older residents use the new facility; some council members urged a temporary “introductory” period and formal reporting so policies can be adjusted based on actual usage.
What the council discussed: Council members and Parks and Rec board members discussed three tied issues: 1) the specific hours and whether a senior-free block should run to 2 p.m. or 5 p.m.; 2) how to prevent one group from blocking repeated two-hour slots; and 3) whether the policy should be treated as permanent or adopted with a built-in review period based on usage data. Councilmember James Harton and others proposed an introductory period (six to 12 months) with Parks and Rec reporting back on usage trends; several council members asked staff to add scheduling constraints (minimum gaps between bookings and staff-managed cleanup windows) to prevent “stacking.”
Motion and outcome: Councilmember (name not specified in roll call) moved to return the draft policy to Parks and Rec and staff with council commentary; the motion passed on a voice vote (ayes recorded; one dissenting ‘nay’). Council directed staff and Parks and Rec to circulate a revised policy for council review and to report back—councilmembers said they preferred a report at six months and a full evaluation after 12 months of operation.
Parks and Rec clarifications: Parks and Rec board chair Adrian Eckenrod said the proposed $1,000,000 insurance requirement applies only to events serving alcohol and that staff would insert a required gap between back-to-back two-hour senior bookings so the facility and staff can prepare between reservations. The board also provided comparative rate data from nearby community centers and recommended keeping the proposed rates as a middle-ground starting point.
Community comments: Multiple residents, several of them Parks and Rec members or senior advocates, spoke in favor of limited free access for seniors and emphasized seniors’ volunteer contributions. Speakers urged the council to prioritize community access rather than tight restrictions that might discourage usage.
Next steps: The council instructed staff to circulate a revised draft to Parks and Rec and to councilmembers, and asked for a Parks and Rec report on usage trends at six months and a full evaluation after 12 months. The council did not adopt permanent fees or an exception at the Dec. 5 meeting.
Ending: Council members said they intended to start the farmhouse operation with policies that can be adjusted after the town collects real usage data rather than locking in a permanent rate structure immediately.
