Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ballot Referral Vacancies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concurrent resolution to send vacancy‑appointment restriction to voters fails in committee; sponsors say they will continue debate
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 1002, a proposed ballot referral that would bar appointees to vacancies from running in the next election for that office, did not advance in committee after an initial motion to send the measure to the Committee of the Whole failed; the resolution was later postponed indefinitely on a reverse roll‑call vote.
House Concurrent Resolution 1002, sponsored by Rep. Bob Marshall and Rep. Succla, would have asked voters to limit appointees who fill elected office vacancies from appearing on the immediate next ballot for that same office. Proponents framed the measure as a way to restore democratic accountability and limit the incumbent advantage created when a small party vacancy committee selects a replacement who then runs as an incumbent.
Marshall told the committee the measure addresses what he described as a growing reliance on vacancy appointments rather than voter selection: he cited a figure from recent sessions showing that roughly 29 of 100 legislators originally entered office via a vacancy committee appointment. He said the change would allow an interim appointee to serve the remainder of a term but prevent that appointee from running in the very next election for that seat, leaving voters to choose a successor without the appointee’s incumbency advantage.
Opponents and several committee members questioned whether the measure was the correct remedy. Legal questions were raised during testimony and in pre‑prepared legal analyses; some witnesses said the proposal risked disenfranchising some voters or raising constitutional questions. Supporters countered that the referral would restore voter trust and argued the courts would likely find the structure permissible. Testimony included perspectives from the Colorado Forward Party, local election experts and other community voices.
The committee first voted on a motion to send the resolution to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. That motion failed on a 6‑5 recorded vote. After additional discussion the committee then took a motion to postpone the resolution indefinitely; that motion passed by reverse roll call and the measure was tabled.
Outcome: The referral will not move forward from this committee; sponsors said they hoped to continue debate with stakeholders and pursue alternative legislative options or another path to place the issue before voters.
Votes at a glance: Motion to refer HCR 1002 to Committee of the Whole — failed 6‑5; Motion to postpone indefinitely (reverse roll call) — carried. The resolution was effectively set aside in committee.
