Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Diversion And Reentry Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judiciary highlights recovery court, jobs program and gun‑violence initiative outcomes
Summary
Acting director Michael Blee summarized recovery court outcomes, a jobs program for probationers, and a gun‑violence reduction initiative during testimony to the Assembly Budget Committee; he cited lower rearrest and reincarceration rates for recovery court graduates and program enrollment figures.
Acting administrative director Michael Blee told the Assembly Budget Committee that several judiciary programs aim to reduce recidivism and improve public safety, and he supplied outcome data during his remarks.
Blee described the recovery court (formerly drug court) as a program that combines treatment, vocational training and supervision. He said rearrest rates for individuals released from state prison who did not participate in recovery court were 47 percent within three years, compared with 14 percent for those after graduation from recovery court. He said reincarceration within three years was about 25 percent for those released from prison generally versus 2 percent for recovery court graduates.
Blee also described a jobs program that began in the Atlantic‑Cape May vicinage. The program directs probationers and people owing child support to job‑training and placement services. “Participants have found work in the healthcare industry, the casino industry, retail, and higher education,” Blee said.
On the gun‑violence reduction initiative, Blee said the program offers an alternative pathway for low‑risk defendants charged with gun possession offenses; he gave a 75 percent completion rate for participants and reported 688 clients served during the referenced core year, including 93 juveniles. Blee provided several individual success stories, including one program graduate who became a staff attorney after overcoming addiction.
Ending: Blee urged continued interbranch collaboration and invited the committee to follow up for more detailed program metrics and funding breakdowns.
