Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance Audit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

East Providence school committee approves FY2023 audit after clean opinion, auditor flags year‑end timing

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CliftonLarsonAllen issued an unmodified opinion on the East Providence School District’s FY2023 financial statements but reported a significant deficiency related to the timeliness of the year‑end close; the school committee voted to accept the audit.

The East Providence School Committee voted to approve the district’s fiscal year 2023 financial statement audit after auditors from CliftonLarsonAllen reported a clean (unmodified) opinion but noted a significant deficiency in the timeliness of the year‑end close.

David Hansen, engagement leader for CliftonLarsonAllen, told the committee the audit covered the district’s October 31, 2023 year end and the federal single audit. “We issued an unmodified opinion,” Hansen said, adding that the audit was performed under GAAP and auditing standards and that the firm reported a “significant deficiency over financial reporting” related to the timeliness of providing close-out information for audit purposes.

Hansen highlighted key figures from the district’s financial statements: the school unrestricted fund balance at year end was reported as $4,700,000, an increase of $56,000 from the prior year. He also reviewed the district’s participation in state retirement and OPEB plans and noted the district implemented the new software lease accounting standard in FY2023.

Craig, a school finance staff member, answered questions about long-term liabilities and funding for OPEB, saying the district’s OPEB trust funding level is 46.22 percent and that deposits are made to the account when available. Hansen and his team recommended that the district consider a formal plan for addressing potential fund deficits as a best practice; the auditors did not report instances of noncompliance with laws, grants or contracts.

After the presentation, a committee member moved to approve the audit and another member seconded; the motion passed on a voice vote. No roll‑call tally was recorded in the minutes. The committee chair said the ayes had it and the audit was accepted.

The acceptance of the audit starts a process in which the district and the city review the auditor’s management letter recommendations and decide whether to bring a formal deficit‑planning policy to the policy committee for consideration.

The audit presentation and approval were the subject of questions from committee members seeking additional context on pension and OPEB funding and the district’s budget closing timeline.