Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Naming Donation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board amends facility naming rules and accepts $200,000 private gift to support district field project
Summary
The Manitowoc School District Board of Education removed a restriction that honorees must be deceased or no longer employed, referred future naming requests to the superintendent and executive committee, and accepted a $200,000 private gift to support renovation and naming of the district baseball/football field.
Get email alerts on the Facilities Naming Donation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Manitowoc School District Board of Education voted to amend its facilities naming policy and accepted a $200,000 private gift to support renovation of the district field, a donor-funded project that board members said will include turf and related work.
Board members agreed to remove a sentence in the facilities/building naming policy that would have required an employee to be deceased or no longer employed to be eligible for an honor. The board also directed that future proposals for facility or building namings be referred to the superintendent and the executive committee for recommendation before coming to the full board.
Board discussion centered on how to handle donor-driven naming proposals without creating partisan or personal conflicts. Several members said they preferred not to create a permanent naming committee; instead they favored vetting proposals through existing committees (facilities and finance) or via the superintendent and executive committee. One board member proposed allowing portions of facilities (for example, a press box or a gate) to be named to broaden opportunities to honor multiple contributors.
Members discussed community reaction: several residents and former coaches had expressed concern that a large donation would result in naming the field after a current coach instead of honoring other longtime coaches. Board members said the district could accept private funds while providing other ways to recognize past contributors.
On the gift, board members said the $200,000 pledge would cover turf and other immediate field work; estimates for a parking lot resurfacing were discussed as a separate expense in the range of about $400,000 to $450,000 (estimate given in meeting remarks). The board agreed to accept the current gift and to put related naming on the agenda for final confirmation at the next meeting.
The board voted to accept the amended policies and to move forward with the gift; the approvals were recorded as voice votes in which members said "aye."

