Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House advances broad elections bill with procedural changes and protections for election workers; amendment to bar removed local officials fails

2879946 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative (Carroll), the bill sponsor, described House Committee substitute for House Bill 507 as a broad elections bill with multiple changes to filing, provisional ballots, absentee procedures and protections for election authorities.

Representative (Carroll), the bill sponsor, described House Committee substitute for House Bill 507 as a broad elections bill with multiple changes to filing, provisional ballots, absentee procedures and protections for election authorities.

Key provisions explained on the floor included allowing filing notices to be transmitted by email; adjusting candidate filing dates so they do not fall on holidays; moving military and overseas voters who wish to register and vote on election day to county election offices (rather than precinct polling places); expanding provisional ballots to be available in all elections; keeping a confidentiality list for the permanently disabled off public distribution; requiring a filing for write-in candidacies if no candidate files for a race; and added protections for election officials, judges and staff from harassment and threats.

Floor amendments: Representative (Carroll) offered Amendment 1 (designated ".01 H" on the floor) that would bar a local official removed by quo warranto proceedings from seeking that same office again. The House debated the amendment: proponents said it would prevent officials found to have violated public trust from returning to the same office; opponents argued the amendment removes choice from voters and could be misused politically. The written roll-call on the amendment failed 66 Yea, 70 Nay, 12 Present.

Representative (Saint Charles) successfully moved Amendment 2 to permit poll watchers and challengers at in-person absentee ballot locations in first-class and charter counties; that amendment was adopted on the floor. Representative (Saint Louis City) offered Amendment 3 to clean up language affecting St. Louis City county offices and require certain tax-disclosure items; Amendment 3 was adopted as well.

Procedural outcome: After floor debate and amendment votes (including the failed adoption of Amendment 1), the House perfected and printed the House Committee substitute for HB507 as amended. A roll call on the failed amendment was recorded; other amendment adoptions were handled by voice and procedural motions as recorded.

Why it matters: The bill would change several administrative election practices used by county clerks and election authorities; the failed amendment on quo warranto drew strong debate about voter choice and local accountability.

Ending: The committee substitute as amended was perfected and printed and will move forward in the legislative process; transcript does not record final passage or concurrence.