Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fuel Equipment Preemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would restrict local bans on new fuel-powered equipment, proponents say
Summary
House Bill 1455 would prevent municipalities from banning the sale of new fuel-powered equipment, sponsors and industry witnesses told the General Laws committee; supporters framed the bill as protecting consumer choice and uniform fuel policy.
Get email alerts on the Fuel Equipment Preemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Jeff Knight introduced House Bill 1455 to the Committee on General Laws as a short, narrowly worded measure intended to prohibit local bans on new fuel-powered equipment.
"It's 7 lines. It's a quick read based on fuel," Knight said when presenting the bill. Several witnesses representing the oil and fuel industry and allied interest groups testified in favor. Ryan Rowden of the American Petroleum Institute said API "supports House Bill 14 55, which ensures Missourians had the choice to purchase new fuel powered equipment that best fits their needs." He framed the bill as preserving consumer choice and letting the market determine fuel types used in motor and lawn equipment.
The Missouri Petroleum and Convenience Association also testified for the bill, with a representative urging that fuel policy be set at the federal level for uniformity. Motorcycle groups including Freedom Road Riders and ABATE Missouri and other witnesses urged preservation of combustion-powered options for motorcycles, tractors and farm equipment.
Committee members asked questions during the hearing about whether local ordinances already in place exist in Missouri; the sponsor said he was not aware of any Missouri municipality that had enacted such a ban and described the bill as a preventive measure. Representative Mackey voiced strong personal objection to leaf blowers in residential neighborhoods during questioning of witnesses, but no formal opposition testimony was recorded during the hearing.
No amendments or formal committee actions were taken during the public hearing.
