SEMCOG presents regional planning resources as county weighs reviving economic‑development corporation and withdrawing from I‑69 partnership

Representatives from the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) briefed St. Clair County commissioners on regional planning services, data tools and funding programs while commissioners discussed several economic‑development next steps, including possible revival of a 1978 Economic Development Corporation (EDC), renewed outreach to Michigan State University extension and membership decisions involving the I‑69 Next Michigan Corridor and other local partnerships.

Amy O'Leary, SEMCOG executive director, described the organization as an association of local governments that holds federal designations for transportation, air and water, and economic development planning. O'Leary said SEMCOG provides member trainings, grant application assistance and environmental and infrastructure data. Kevin Vitrano, planning director, highlighted data resources — crash maps, pavement condition scores and a community explorer dashboard — and a planning assistance program that provides up to $50,000 for local planning projects. David Struck described a new location‑analysis tool (Placer AI) and an “Experience Southeast Michigan” program that produces promotional videos communities can use for marketing and grant applications.

Following the presentation, commissioners debated the county's role in economic development. County staff presented a memo outlining next steps: define the county's role, consider reviving the 1978 EDC, and clarify relationships with partner organizations before entering contracts. Commissioners discussed models used by other counties and the need for transparency and public accountability.

A motion to “move to poll board to withdraw the county from the I‑69 Next Michigan Corridor” was made, supported and carried in committee; the motion advances the matter to the full board. Commissioners also approved a $999 membership renewal with the Blue Water Chamber of Commerce and voted to send that item to the full board (the membership renewal was recorded as approved in committee). Commissioners directed county legal counsel to review Ordinance/Act 78‑1 to determine whether reviving or using that 1978 EDC structure is viable. Several commissioners said they would pursue outreach to MSU extension and to municipal leaders about economic development options.

No final decisions on creating a county EDC, hiring staff or funding a new economic‑development program were taken in committee; the items will return to the full board for action.