Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cpace topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners direct staff to study CPACE program as a tool to finance commercial energy and resilience projects
Summary
The board instructed staff to draft a C-PACE resolution and analyze legal, staffing and implementation considerations after a developer-led presentation on how such financing could support local projects.
The Lyon County Board of Commissioners on April 3 directed county staff to draft and return a proposed resolution to opt the county into a Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) program and to analyze implementation implications, including legal review and staff time.
The instruction followed a presentation by developer Brett Lovett and representatives from program-administration and capital providers who said C-PACE is an assessment-based financing tool to fund energy-efficiency, renewable-energy, water-efficiency and resiliency projects on qualifying commercial properties. Brian McCarter, who administers C-PACE programs in multiple Nevada jurisdictions, told commissioners the program is enabled by state legislation and that local jurisdictions adopt implementing resolutions and typically hire third-party administrators to manage transactions.
Commissioners debated staff time and risk. Commissioner Dunwich said he was concerned about staff workload and long-term risks to properties if projects later failed, citing experience with construction defaults. County legal staff confirmed they had done preliminary review of a model resolution but said a fuller legal analysis and policy recommendation would be needed.
Board direction: by unanimous vote the board directed the county manager and district attorney’s office to draft a resolution and return with a recommended implementation plan and legal review; staff were asked to estimate the upfront time and ongoing administrative workload and to propose whether a third-party administrator should be retained.
Why it matters: supporters said C-PACE can fill financing gaps for projects that struggle to attract traditional capital in rural markets and could spur private investment in energy and resilience upgrades. Opponents and cautious commissioners asked for protections and clarity on county liability, the impact of recorded assessments on future sales and the staffing burden of program oversight.
The board did not adopt a resolution at the April 3 meeting; staff were asked to return with a draft and analysis, with commissioners suggesting a 4–6 week timeframe for staff work after the legislative session.
