Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Foster council approves interim administrative officer, records opposition to state gun bills and advances zoning review schedule
Summary
Council approved a series of routine actions: accepting the consent agenda with an exception, appointing an interim administrative officer, placing a resolution opposing 2025 state gun legislation on record and sending multiple zoning ordinance drafts back to planning or continuing hearings.
The Foster Town Council recorded several formal actions Wednesday during its meeting.
Consent agenda: The council voted to accept the consent agenda as presented, except for the March 13 meeting minutes, which the council set aside for separate consideration. Councilors approved the consent agenda by voice vote; one council member abstained on the March 13 minutes noting they were not present for that meeting.
Appointment of interim administrative officer: The council voted to appoint interim town planner Peter Lipola as administrative officer, giving him authority to sign certain documents as described by staff. The motion carried on a voice vote after a motion, a second and brief discussion that this authority would allow the administrative officer to sign routine items.
Resolution on 2025 gun legislation: The council moved to place Resolution 2025‑01 — a resolution opposing pending Rhode Island assault‑weapons and related firearm restrictions under consideration in the 2025 General Assembly — on the town record. The resolution states the council's opposition to bills it views as unduly restricting the Second Amendment and objects to any unfunded local mandates the legislation might impose. After public comment from local residents who spoke in support of the resolution, the council voted by voice to put the resolution on record; the motion passed.
Zoning and ordinance schedule: Councilors voted to send a set of draft zoning ordinance amendments back to the planning board for further work and to continue several ordinance hearings to future meetings to allow additional review. The items sent back or continued included proposed updates to setback and parking standards, commercial‑vehicle language in residential zones, off‑street loading screening standards, and several housekeeping changes to align local code with state law. Specific ordinance references discussed included section numbers cited by the council (e.g., 38273, 38280, 38326 and others); the council set continuation dates for some items to April 24 and May 22 so planners could revise drafts.
How votes were taken: Most votes were voice votes. Where individual vote tallies or roll calls were not recorded in the transcript, the meeting minutes will include the official record.
Ending: The council took no final action on pending legislation or large capital appropriation moves during the meeting; most items were either administrative or sent back for further review.
