Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Firetrucks Equip Purchase topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Onalaska board approves advance payment to secure new fire tanker after multi-year delivery timeline
Summary
The Board approved an advance-payment purchase schedule for a 2029 Pierce Velocity bumper tanker after a multi-hour discussion about delivery timing, prepayment discounts and reserve impacts; the motion passed with one recorded dissent.
The Onalaska Board of Public Works and Utilities voted to proceed with a contract for a 2029 Pierce Velocity bumper tanker and approved an advance-payment schedule that uses $500,000 already reserved plus an additional draw from the equipment replacement fund.
The vote follows extended discussion about the vehicle’s long lead time (now estimated at fall 2029, about 52–55 months), vendor prepayment discounts and the effect of an upfront payment on city reserves and future budgets. The board adopted a motion to make the advance payment that includes the $500,000 already committed in the 2025 capital plan and an additional $619,921 from the equipment replacement fund; the motion passed with one member recorded as opposed.
Board members and staff spent much of the discussion weighing the financial trade-offs. The single bid returned March 17 totaled $1,314,159; staff noted additional loose-equipment costs (hoses, nozzles and other accessories) likely to remain at the end of the purchase. The vendor offered an estimated total prepayment savings (if certain upfront payments are made) of about $194,238 compared with paying at delivery. Staff recommended proceeding rather than delaying because a vendor price increase was expected in mid-May and because the delivery window is long.
City finance staff described the city’s reserves and investment earnings as support for making an upfront payment. Board members urged caution about putting large sums up front, noting contract language and vendor strength should be reviewed. The board confirmed the city attorney would review purchase contract language and protections before final execution.
Motion and outcome: The board approved the advance-payment approach; the motion required drawing additional funds from the equipment replacement fund beyond the $500,000 already reserved. One board member recorded opposition. The board also directed staff to prepare a resolution for city council that would present the payment plan and required budget adjustments.
The board asked staff to track and, if possible, reimburse or restore the equipment replacement fund in future budget cycles if excess revenues allow.
(Details in meeting minutes: staff reported one bid, a $1,314,159 base price; delivery estimated fall 2029; potential prepayment savings ~ $194,238; additional equipment and loose items not included in the bid were discussed.)
The board did not adopt any changes to specification language at the meeting; staff said contract protections and final payment schedule will be prepared for council action.
