Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oakwood Phase 5 proposal would add 51 units, clubhouse and pool; rezoning needed

2872017 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers pitched changing a planned duplex phase in Oakwood to fourplexes that would add 51 rental units and an amenity package including a clubhouse, pool and pickleball courts. Planning staff said the change would require rezoning to an RP-3 plan district and a full site package before project review continues.

Spring Hill City planning staff and developers presented a conceptual plan for Oakwood Phase 5 that would convert a previously approved duplex layout into a mix of fourplex and single-family lots, adding about 51 dwelling units and a planned amenity package.

Planning staff said the proposal would require rezoning from R-2 (duplex zoning) to an RP-3 plan district before a formal site plan is considered. The developer’s concept includes a clubhouse with gym and meeting space, a large pool with enclosed mechanical equipment, picnic/party space for residents, playground equipment, and two pickleball courts without lights; staff said the applicant added a hedge buffer to reduce noise impacts.

The concept drawings shown to the commission position fourplex buildings closer to the street with 5-foot front setbacks for some unit types and preserve larger green-space corridors and walking trails through the development. Staff described a mix of unit types and rents the developer expects, including one- and two-bedroom units and a range of two- and three-bedroom layouts with some units priced to be more affordable than nearby market-rate rentals.

Commission members raised traffic and construction impacts from the added units and asked whether east-side access improvements would be built before new construction begins; staff said the access work is underway as part of the current construction phase. Neighbors’ main past concern, staff said, was construction traffic; commissioners asked staff to consider one-side parking during construction and to refer any traffic controls to the city safety committee for study.

Several commissioners asked about storm-safety provisions because many proposed rental units would lack basements; staff said the commission could request a storm shelter be incorporated into a clubhouse building or other amenity structure. Staff also told the commission that landscaping, street-tree spacing and sidewalk standards will be required in the full submittal and that the plan district route allows design flexibility not available for straight R-2 zoning.

Pat, the presenting staff member, asked the commission for preliminary feedback and said the applicant would return with a full plan package that includes elevations, setback detail, typical plot plans and a formal rezoning application. Commissioners generally said they were receptive to seeing a full package for formal consideration.

Planning staff will ask the applicant to return with a complete site plan and elevations for the commission’s review and possible rezoning proceedings.