Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks User Fees Youth Sports topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee debates bill limiting youth-sports park user fees; cities urge caution
Summary
Senate Bill 420 would limit municipal user fees for children’s participation in park-based team sports. Sponsor Sen. Ellie Boldman said the measure aims to preserve access for low-income families; city officials warned it could shift costs onto taxpayers and contracts with user groups.
Senate Bill 420 — described by sponsor Sen. Ellie Boldman as a measure to ensure equitable access to youth sports in public parks — prompted a contentious hearing in the Senate Local Government Committee.
The bill would cap certain municipal user fees for children’s participation in park-based recreational programs and set a low-dollar limit (the committee transcript referenced a $25-a-month or $10 three-day maximum for some uses in committee discussion). Boldman told the committee the measure is intended to prevent municipalities from effectively charging children’s participation through high user fees and to keep the cost of youth sports affordable.
Witnesses were split. Supporters argued user fees increasingly make participation unaffordable and that municipalities can still collect fees for specialized, high-cost facilities (the sponsor said swimming pools and ice rinks were exempt in the draft and signaled willingness to add limited exemptions for expensive turf or specialty fields). Opponents — including Jennifer Olson (Montana League of Cities and Towns), Donna Gockler (Missoula Parks and Recreation director), council members and parks directors from Billings, Whitefish and other cities — said the bill would disrupt negotiated contracts with user groups that reserve exclusive field time, threaten specialized programming (camps, tournaments and clubs) and potentially force taxpayers to subsidize elite travel programs. Missoula’s parks director said exclusive-use agreements fund maintenance for lighting, snow removal and other services for special-use fields.
City officials warned the language is broad and could sweep in summer camps and other uses city residents expect to pay for, and asked the committee to consider either rejecting or narrowing the proposal. The sponsor said she is open to amendments to exempt specialty facilities and to work with local governments to preserve core municipal services while limiting excessive user fees for children’s basic participation. No committee vote was recorded in the transcript excerpt.
