Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Captive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances captive-insurance housekeeping changes in H.137
Summary
Department of Financial Regulation staff briefed the Senate Finance Committee on sections 5–14 of H.137, a set of housekeeping amendments to Vermont’s captive-insurance statutes covering licensing references, manager-managed LLC language, mutual-insurer governance and reinsurance limits.
The Senate Finance Committee heard staff from the Department of Financial Regulation (DFR) explain amendments in H.137 that would update and clarify Vermont’s captive‑insurance statute. The committee was told the changes are primarily housekeeping: they align statutory cross‑references, modernize terminology for manager‑managed limited liability companies and clarify governance rules for mutual captives and reinsurance authority.
Sandy Bigglestone, acting commissioner at the Department of Financial Regulation and deputy commissioner for the captive-insurance division, told the committee “the captive pieces are in, sections 5 through 14 of H.137.” She said the amendments largely bring captive statute references into alignment with Title 8, including a consistent referral to section 3301 for permissible lines of business and updated cross-references for LLC governance.
Key edits explained to the committee - Clarify licensing authority by referencing Title 8 section 3301 for lines of business, and explicitly limit captives to commercial lines (no personal-lines/homeowners coverage). - Update statutory language for manager‑managed LLCs so that individuals authorized by the governing board (not just corporate officers) have signatory and managerial recognition. - Add references for mutual‑insurer governance (sections 3303 and 3311) so election and meeting procedures are explicit for mutual captives. - Align reinsurance language so captives may reinsure parent, affiliated and controlled unaffiliated business but do not become general reinsurance companies by taking 100% unrelated third‑party risk. - Correct numbering and lettering errors for risk retention group governance provisions and reapply manager‑managed LLC language where needed.
DFR staff described the package as technical and low risk; committee members asked clarifying questions about scope and whether any of the changes would broaden captive authority beyond standard practice. DFR answered the bill preserves limiting rules (for example, excluding personal-lines business) while removing outdated internal cross‑references.
Next steps DFR indicated the changes are intended to reduce confusion and improve statutory coherence. Committee members did not propose substantive expansions to captive authority during the hearing.
