Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Election Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee pauses House Bill 16‑94 after debate over mandatory online campaign‑reporting exceptions
Summary
Sponsors said House Bill 16‑94 would require elected officials’ campaign finance reports be filed online; committee members and the secretary of state’s assistant director of elections pressed for an explicit backup process for when systems fail and the sponsor agreed to withdraw the bill to draft an amendment.
House Bill 16‑94, sponsored by Representative RJ Hawk, would require campaign contribution and expenditure reports for elected officials in state government to be filed electronically rather than on paper. The measure was described as a manpower and efficiency change requested by the Secretary of State’s office; sponsors said only five paper filers currently remain in state government.
Committee members pressed for protections and contingencies. Senator Peyton and others asked whether the bill includes exceptions or a fallback if the online filing system is unavailable; Representative Hawk did not have language in the bill but invited a representative from the Secretary of State’s office to answer. Josh Bridges, assistant director of elections for the Secretary of State, told the committee the bill covers campaign finance reports (not statements of financial interest) and that the office’s newer filing system is more robust than older systems, though no exception language was included in the bill text.
Several senators urged a statutory provision or rule requiring a temporary alternative — for example, email or fax receipt by the SOS before the midnight deadline with subsequent ratification when the system is restored. Senator Dodson suggested an exception allowing the SOS to accept emailed or faxed filings prior to the deadline and a short cure period to ratify files in the electronic system. Representative Hawk ultimately said he would pull the bill and return with an amendment that addresses a backup filing procedure.
Outcome: Representative Hawk withdrew the bill from immediate consideration in committee to draft an amendment incorporating a contingency process for system outages and other technical failures.
Why it matters: Supporters said electronic filing reduces manual data entry work for the Secretary of State’s staff. Opponents and skeptical members asked for statutory safeguards to ensure filers can meet deadlines when technical problems occur, noting that candidates or officials who experience an outage may be unable to meet time‑stamped deadlines without a documented alternative.
Next steps: Sponsor committed to bringing an amended bill back with language addressing temporary backup procedures and how those filings would be ratified in the SOS electronic system.
