Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cra Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lake Placid CRA votes to move to quarterly meetings; board raises alarm over state bill that would eliminate CRAs

2865863 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The CRA voted to move to a quarterly meeting schedule and discussed a pending Tallahassee measure to eliminate community redevelopment authorities; members urged outreach to state legislators and partner organizations.

The Placid Community Redevelopment Agency voted to shift its regular meeting schedule toward a quarterly cadence and debated timing and logistics for that change. Members also discussed a state legislative measure under consideration in Tallahassee that would curtail or eliminate CRAs statewide.

On the meeting-frequency question, the board debated whether to keep meetings early in the month or to move them to the third week to avoid conflicts with council and other obligations. A motion to change the CRA meeting schedule to a quarterly cadence and to reschedule meetings (timing to be brought back at the second reading) was moved and carried. Recorded votes during the session showed Council member Hayes — yes; Council member Eberhard — yes; Council member Worley — no; Board member Hartsell — yes. Members noted that the CRA ordinance requires at least quarterly meetings and that a second reading or follow-up may be required before the schedule takes effect.

Separately, Council member Eberhard raised a concern about a bill in the state legislature that, if enacted, would eliminate community redevelopment authorities. Board members said staff and local partners had contacted regional planning and municipal networks. Staff reported coordination with the Central Florida Regional Planning Council and with local advocates; they advised board members about League of Cities resources and advocacy actions that allow citizens and officials to contact legislators about the proposal.

Board members expressed concern about the broader implications for local redevelopment authority and control over CRA funds if a state action were to proceed. Members asked staff to circulate guidance on how to contact legislators and noted the potential need for a coordinated letter or advocacy through the municipal league if the bill advanced in Tallahassee.