Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Street Lighting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Placid CRA delays street‑lighting choice; asks staff to pilot and align with revitalization plan
Summary
The CRA voted to continue evaluation of downtown street lighting, recommend a pilot of several fixtures and defer final lighting and fixture purchases until after the downtown revitalization workshop and recommendations.
The Placid Community Redevelopment Agency voted to continue evaluating downtown street lighting rather than selecting a design immediately, directing staff to pursue further study and a multi‑unit pilot.
Town staff presented a memorandum summarizing case studies and technical considerations including examples from Daytona Beach (a $1 million solar LED pilot of 360 lights funded by bonds), St. Pete Beach (work performed with Duke Energy), Orlando (a $5 million LED conversion) and Riverpark Naples (155 fixtures; $25,000 in allocated repairs). The staff presentation listed factors for the CRA to consider: aesthetics and community character, fixture durability and wind resistance, light directionality (full cutoff LED designs), replacement inventory and maintenance, and color temperature (warm LEDs vs. yellowish light that can affect color rendition).
The presentation recommended a pilot test and suggested ordering three to five fixtures for real‑life evaluation rather than a single demonstration unit. Staff told the board that retrofit options could reduce cost and disruption if existing structures were structurally sound but cautioned that retrofits might not deliver the desired downward-directed lighting.
A motion to continue evaluation, to defer any final purchasing decisions until after the downtown revitalization plan and workshop recommendations, and to return with lighting recommendations at the next CRA meeting was moved and approved. The roll-call vote recorded Council member Hayes, Council member Worley, Council member Eberhard and Board member Hartsell in favor.
During discussion board members emphasized balancing “functionality and aesthetics.” One member warned against rushing choices that will remain in place for decades, observing that fixtures may remain for 20–30 years and that long-term value and community character should guide selection. The motion as entered into the record directed staff to pursue additional feedback, align lighting choices with the Central Florida Regional Planning Council’s revitalization work and perform a pilot test before committing to a full installation.
Staff also discussed practical procurement considerations including module standardization for easier replacement, storing a 5–10% inventory of spare units, choosing fixtures with high wind-load ratings, and whether to choose sealed bulbs or standard modules for maintainability.
The board did not select a fixture model or place an order for street lights at the meeting; rather, it directed further evaluation and a pilot deployment ahead of any purchase.
