Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Childcare topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assembly rejects motion to discharge childcare study bill for immediate floor consideration

2865057 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to discharge Assembly bill A2042, which would have directed OCFS to study barriers to creating childcare providers and report recommendations, failed 47-100 after floor debate about procedure and the childcare crisis.

A motion to discharge Assembly bill A2042 — a measure that would authorize the Office of Children and Family Services to study barriers to creating childcare providers and to issue recommendations to the governor and legislature — failed on the Assembly floor after a party-line procedural vote on April 3.

Sponsor Mister Maher moved the discharge so the bill could be brought to the full chamber for immediate consideration. Maher described the measure as a bipartisan “starting point” to address a statewide childcare shortage, citing a statistic he attributed to the Office of Children and Family Services that 64% of New York families live in areas classified as childcare deserts compared with a 50% national average. He said the bill would authorize OCFS to audit related state agencies and produce legislative recommendations, and he cited examples of provider declines in Mid-Hudson communities: Poughkeepsie providers declining from 52 to 25, Newburgh 26 to 10, and similar losses in Middletown.

Maher said the bill would require OCFS to consult with other agencies, including the Department of Education and the Department of Financial Services, to uncover administrative or insurance barriers that can force providers to close. He described a provider that faced an increase in insurance costs tied to workers’ compensation treatment of certain assistance as earned income, an example he said illustrates cross-agency effects on provider viability.

Opponents on the floor framed the vote as strictly procedural. Miss People Stokes and others said the correct route for legislation is committee review; Stokes urged colleagues to reject the discharge motion so the bill would continue through the committee process. Miss Walsh (the speaker) and multiple members explained that the chamber’s discharge motions are a rules-based “safety valve” but stressed the current vote was about procedure rather than the bill’s merits.

Several speakers urged bringing the issue to the floor despite procedure, calling childcare an affordability crisis and arguing a vote would show the Legislature’s seriousness. Mister Durso, Mister Slater and Mister Bologna urged support for the discharge, stressing bipartisan backing and parents’ experiences with failing care arrangements. Mister Ra and others from the majority argued that committee processes provide an appropriate forum and noted many minority conference bills were placed on committee agendas but did not receive substantive committee votes.

The clerk recorded the vote: 47 ayes, 100 noes; the motion failed.

Details of the bill: According to Maher’s floor summary, A2042 would authorize the commissioner of the Office of Children and Family Services to conduct a study on barriers to creating child care providers, consult other state agencies, and report findings and legislative recommendations to the governor and legislature. The bill’s procedural disposition on April 3 was a failed motion to discharge; no committee consideration outcomes were decided on the floor.