Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Compensation Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards proposal to raise countywide and county board salaries to executive; debate highlights job scope, pension and timing

2863980 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended discussion about the duties of countywide elected officials and county board members, the finance committee voted to forward a proposed salary increase schedule to the executive committee; members asked for job summaries, IMRF cost information and further review at the executive and full board levels.

The Will County finance committee debated a proposed schedule of salary increases for countywide elected officials and county board members before voting to send the proposal to the executive committee for further review and a possible county board public hearing.

Committee members and staff discussed the absence of single, consolidated job descriptions for countywide elected offices and noted statutes often define duties across multiple documents. Finance staff provided historical context showing the last comprehensive salary change occurred in the mid‑2000s and presented a worksheet that illustrated projected budget impacts if the increases were implemented (staff estimated a first‑year net cost of roughly $136,000 to the county’s payroll budget under one scenario).

Members raised several questions: how salaries compare with peer counties, how increases affect retirement (IMRF) and benefit costs, whether countywide offices function as full‑time positions, and whether county board compensation should remain a part‑time stipend. Multiple members asked staff to prepare IMRF and fringe‑cost estimates, and several requested succinct job summaries from countywide offices to clarify duties. Some members said higher pay could attract different candidates and recognize increased workload; others cautioned against sudden large increases and recommended staged or smaller annual adjustments instead.

After discussion the committee voted to forward the salary schedule to the executive committee with direction that additional materials be prepared for executive and county‑board consideration — including pension/IMRF cost impacts, job‑scope descriptions or presentations from countywide officers, and options for phased increases. Roll call recorded at least one “no” vote and the motion carried.

The committee’s vote advances the item for placement on the county board calendar; any final salary changes would require county board action and, where applicable, alignment with statutory payroll and benefit rules.