Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Staffing And Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union warns staffing cuts are disrupting buildings as district cites projected enrollment declines
Summary
At the March 31 Yakima School Board meeting, the Yakima Education Association president said recent staffing reductions and unclear enrollment math have upended staff placements; the district's chief financial officer and superintendent said staffing is driven by enrollment projections and state budget uncertainty.
Frannie Guerrero, president of the Yakima Education Association, told the Yakima School Board on March 31 that recent staffing moves and planned reductions are hurting school staffing stability and morale.
Guerrero said last year's reductions removed about 62 positions districtwide and that subsequent moves left roughly 38 staff placed into the unassigned pool. “Those 38 positions that got cut upends another 38 to give them a chance to stay in the building,” she said, arguing the district’s enrollment figures do not justify the scope of cuts and calling for clearer, consistent data.
The concern focused on two points: the mechanics of recall and placement after reductions, and the district’s use of multiple enrollment numbers. Guerrero said the district’s published head count showed only about a 25-student decline year over year, yet staffing reductions have been substantial. She also criticized late or last-minute cuts that leave educators unsure of assignments and said two buildings are moving toward votes of no confidence in their administrators because of resource shortfalls.
Jacob Cooper, the district’s chief financial officer, responded that staffing is “ratio driven” and based on projected enrollment and program mix, not only the current head count. “You’re not looking at apples to apples,” Cooper said, explaining that the district uses projected enrollment and then makes allocations that account for self-contained special education placements and other program factors. He offered to provide principals and union representatives the underlying math used to allocate staff.
Superintendent Dr. Green and Cooper reiterated that some reductions reflect higher prior-year staffing levels and downward projections used for planning. The board discussed the larger state budget picture at length later in the meeting (see related article on the legislature and district finances), and Cooper and the superintendent warned that final local decisions will depend on the outcome of pending state budget actions.
Guerrero also raised a separate concern about the YOL program, saying contracting with outside teachers last year displaced veteran district staff who should have been recalled to district positions. She said the deputy superintendent intervened to resolve the situation and asked the district to prevent a repeat.
The board did not take formal action on staffing during the meeting. Cooper said staff would share the enrollment-projection math on request, and Guerrero offered to work with district leaders on joint advocacy for state revenue.
Why it matters: staffing allocations determine classroom sizes, specialist availability and school operations; changes tied to complex enrollment and program formulas can affect teacher assignments and building-level morale. The district emphasized the numerical basis for its decisions and promised to share data on projection methods with principals and union representatives.
Questions or follow-up: Board members asked for clearer, point-in-time comparisons and for district staff to provide the projection spreadsheets Cooper referenced; Guerrero asked for a spring timeline so staff would not learn of cuts only days before school starts.
