Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Park Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee endorses standard park sign templates and explores QR code options

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reviewed proposed sign templates for parks projects, discussed sizes, placement, QR codes and funding sources, and agreed staff should order example signs and include sign standards in future application materials.

The Community Preservation Committee reviewed sample sign renderings for Parks projects on March 26 and agreed to adopt a standard template and explore QR-code options, subject to final placement and project budgets.

Kristen presented two standard designs: a smaller pavilion-mounted sign for Alavizos (replacement) and a larger 24-by-24 sign for park entrances such as Bond Street, Stearns and Elliott. Committee members noted the larger signs (about $250 each) were not cost-prohibitive and could be included in project budgets. "They're not, prohibitive," Kristen said, and members discussed whether applicants should include sign costs in project proposals.

On QR codes Amanda explained they translate a website URL into a machine-readable form and recommended deciding how often the underlying website URL might change before permanently embedding codes into signs. "What matters is are you going to end up changing that URL because when you change the URL that's what would necessitate changing, the pattern of that box essentially," Amanda said. Members agreed weather-safe, replaceable QR stickers are feasible if the town expects to update links.

Members also discussed indoor-versus-outdoor signage, smaller plaques for historical or indoor conservation projects, and whether older, completed CPC projects should receive signs. Kristen said project budgets with remaining funds could cover replacement signs for projects that still have money; otherwise the committee could use administrative funds to supply signs for closed projects. The committee directed staff to finalize templates, consider a QR solution, and add sign requirements to future application materials.