Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Temporary Parking Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission allows five-vehicle arrangement for Medina property, limits outside parking to four cars
Summary
After a code-enforcement complaint, the commission voted 3-0 to allow four adults at a house and four vehicles parked outside plus one vehicle to be stored inside the one-car garage, with a 24-month review; staff had recommended denial based on the county code that allows three vehicles.
Get email alerts on the Temporary Parking Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cobb County Planning Commission voted 3-0 on April 1 to allow a temporary vehicle/occupancy arrangement at a single-family property associated with case LEP 10 (Jose R. Medina). The commission approved a two-year temporary permit to allow four adults at the residence and to permit four vehicles to be parked outside while one vehicle must remain inside the home’s one-car garage.
The decision followed a code-enforcement complaint that recorded six vehicles at the site on Nov. 13, 2024. Planning staff recommended denial because county code limits outside parking at the property to three vehicles based on the house size. The applicant, Jose Art Medina, told the commission he owns the property and that the household includes multiple adult occupants and that one part of the garage is used for a laundry and furnace area, making the garage effectively single-car usable for storage and utilities. Medina said a work van with ladders would not fit in the garage.
Staff indicated the core issue is consistent enforcement of the county’s vehicle-and-parking rules; a staff investigator was not present at the hearing. Commissioners pressed the applicant on household composition and parking arrangements: the record shows four adults and two children currently reside at the address. A commissioner observed that if the commission allowed four cars outside then the one-car garage would need to be used for one vehicle to avoid return code-enforcement complaints.
The approving motion specified that four cars may be parked outside and that one must be stored inside the garage at all times; the commission set the permit with a two-year term and directed the case to be placed on the consent agenda for the board of commissioners’ 2-week final action. The motion passed 3-0.
Key clarifications recorded at the hearing: the county code’s standard maximum for this dwelling had been three vehicles outside; the original complaint alleged six vehicles on site; the garage measures and constraints (laundry/furnace location) were described by the applicant. The commission made the temporary allowance on the record to reduce the immediate code-enforcement conflict while requiring the garage to be used as part of the solution.

