Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Supervision Revocation Sentencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge Boyd revokes supervision and sentences Michael Donovan Williams to three years in prison
Summary
The 187th District Court revoked supervision for Michael Donovan Williams after the court found a reporting violation true and imposed a three‑year prison sentence, while discussing treatment options and the possibility of therapeutic community placement.
Judge Stephanie Boyd revoked community supervision and sentenced Michael Donovan Williams to three years in prison after the court found true an allegation that he failed to report as required while on supervision.
At a hearing in Bexar County’s 187th District Court, the court confirmed Williams had been placed on community supervision in Feb. 2023 and that the State alleged Williams failed to report to his supervision officer for the period including May 15, 2024. The court asked Williams whether he understood that finding a violation true could lead to up to a three‑year prison sentence; Williams did not contest the court's admonition and the court followed the parties' agreement to revoke supervision and impose the underlying sentence.
Judge Boyd discussed treatment options with Williams during the hearing, noting local programs and the possibility of felony drug‑court or DDRF placement if the treatment providers accepted him. "If you want the help, then I will give you the help, but it's going to be some type of inpatient treatment," Boyd said, explaining that prison sometimes provides services but is not a guaranteed path to treatment. The judge also noted the state was taking into consideration other pending felony possession counts when pronouncing sentence.
The court ordered credit for time served, advised Williams that because the conviction is a felony he is prohibited from possessing firearms, and noted that Williams waived certain appellate rights as part of the plea agreement the court followed. The judge encouraged Williams to seek assistance for housing and treatment upon release and said court staff could help coordinate referrals if needed.
Why it matters: The ruling ends Williams’s local supervision and imposes a custodial sentence while signaling the court’s preference for treatment where feasible. That recommendation may affect where Williams is placed during or after incarceration and whether he can access in‑custody or post‑release treatment programs.
What the court said next
The court entered judgment following the agreement presented and asked defense counsel to ensure Williams completed any required paperwork. The court also referenced potential referrals to therapeutic community programs and noted state consideration of other felony possession allegations in sentencing.
The hearing concluded with the court calling on Williams to engage with offered treatment resources if he wished to seek alternatives to incarceration in future matters.
