Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Court Billing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County considers phased increases to district-court billing rates for cities; staff to meet with cities

2856372 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff presented three phasing options to increase district-court billing rates charged to cities, including a two‑year phase-in and alternatives that assume a county base contribution; staff will meet with cities beginning with Kelso to present options.

Cowlitz County finance staff outlined three options to phase increased district-court billing rates charged to cities to recover operating costs that have not been adjusted since 2021.

All three options would phase an increase over two years to reach a target allocation (presented as $61.70 for infractions and $219.94 for criminal cases). Option 1 phased the full increase in two equal parts over 2026–2027. Option 2 assumed the county would carry a base share (for example ~15% of total cost) and then allocate the remainder by case numbers with a capped first-year increase (no more than 25%), phasing the rest the following year. Option 3 proposed applying cumulative CPI increases first (roughly 20–22%) and then moving in a second year to the full cost allocation, which would make the second-year increase larger in percentage terms.

Staff said city negotiations will begin immediately; the first meeting was scheduled for the following day with the City of Kelso. Staff and commissioners discussed that the county already carries fixed base costs (judicial and staffing costs) and that case-count allocation will not remove base overhead. Staff said they plan to provide final numbers to cities in summer so municipalities can include changes in their upcoming budgets.

Ending: Staff will meet with cities, present the three phasing options and associated numbers, and return with recommended allocations and an implementation timeline to give cities sufficient lead time for budgeting.