Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flag Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff recommends Fircrest-style flag policy to make flagpole displays city government speech
Summary
After months of public debate over the pride flag, Newcastle staff recommended a flag policy modeled on Fircrest’s: fly required government flags (U.S., state, POW/MIA) and treat other requests as commemorative displays that must be requested by a council member and placed on the planning calendar for deliberate council action.
Get email alerts on the Flag Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff told the Newcastle City Council on April 1 that the council should adopt a flag policy modeled on Fircrest’s to end confusion about which flags the city will display and to treat flagpole displays as government speech rather than a public forum.
The distinction matters because some residents argued that raising one community or interest flag would obligate the city to raise many others; staff said designating nonrequired flags as commemorative and requiring a councilmember request would avoid that result.
City Manager Pingle summarized staff’s recommended approach, saying the policy would treat the U.S. flag, the state flag and the POW/MIA flag as the required government flags and classify any other flag as commemorative. “Anything that's not a required flag… any other flag would be a commemorative flag,” Pingle said. He said commemorative-flag requests should be brought by a sitting council member, put on the planning calendar, and deliberate council action should follow.
Council member Sherlock said the Fircrest model was concise and addressed the elements the council needed. “I would support something very similar to the Fircrest flag policy,” Sherlock said during discussion. Council member Quigg added a practical revision request: change any policy text to refer to Newcastle rather than Fircrest.
City Attorney Curtis reviewed the Fircrest policy earlier and staff said he flagged no legal obstacles to a similar Newcastle policy. Staff recommended returning a Newcastle-version of the Fircrest policy for adoption; the council reached consensus to bring back an adapted Fircrest draft for formal consideration rather than taking immediate action.
Ending
Staff will prepare a Newcastle-specific draft of the Fircrest policy for a future agenda. The draft will reflect the council’s direction that commemorative flags be treated as government speech, require a council member to sponsor requests, and be scheduled on the planning calendar for a future council vote.

