Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Revision Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community member challenges PSBA-based policy revisions, raises concerns about limits on public comment
Summary
A resident questioned proposed policy language changes recommended by PSBA, asked about changes to the school safety reporting form and the Title IX coordinator, and raised concern about language that would limit who may provide public comment at board meetings.
At the March 31 Wissahickon School Board meeting, community member Karmina Taylor questioned several draft policy revisions on the agenda and said changes recommended by the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA) could limit who may speak during public comment.
Taylor asked why language in a first-reading policy (Policy 249.1) changed references from the Safe Schools Report to a "School Safety and Security Incident Report" and why the draft did not specify when the annual safety report would be published for parents and stakeholders. She also asked, "who is the Title IX coordinator?" and requested clearer, more digestible explanations for policy changes so residents unfamiliar with board proceedings can follow revisions.
Taylor returned during the second public comment period to raise a broader objection. She said the proposed public-comment policy would restrict comments to current residents or taxpayers and remove language allowing "anyone representing a group in the community or school district," describing that alteration as "outrageous." Taylor recalled a 2021 example in a neighboring district that she said used similar language to limit who could speak and said the district has discretion to modify PSBA recommendations.
Policy committee chair Marshall told the board that the revisions under consideration were PSBA recommendations covering several topics — including pregnant or married students, hazing, bullying and cyberbullying (with new references to AI), educator misconduct, procurement, assessment appeals, professional student-adult boundaries, use of network resources and student records. Marshall said he would seek approval of the first reading of those revisions at the next meeting.
Board members asked that future policy packets include brief rationales for recommended changes so the board and the public can more easily see why language was altered. The record shows the changes discussed at the March 31 meeting were presented as first-reading PSBA recommendations; no final board action was recorded in the transcript.
