Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Votes at a glance: bills the Senate Revenue and Tax Committee advanced or approved Oct. 12

2852588 · April 2, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee approved a package of mostly procedural and agency-cleanup bills, a farmers’ tax exemption measure and a large economic-development tax-credit proposal; one high-profile county sales-tax reallocation bill failed to get a committee 'do pass' recommendation.

The Senate Revenue and Tax Committee on Oct. 12 handled a mix of agency cleanup, taxpayer procedural fixes, and tax-incentive bills. After debate on SB394 (see separate article), the committee voted on and advanced several other measures, most by voice votes or unanimous consent. The list below summarizes each bill the committee considered and the committee action recorded in the transcript.

Bills the committee advanced (short descriptions and committee action):

- SB408 — Income-tax exemption for certain federal agricultural disaster and economic aid payments (sponsor: Blake Johnson). Committee approved a “do pass” recommendation by voice vote after DFA presented a budget-neutral scoring; sponsor said relief addresses 2024 crop-year losses. (Motion: Senator Boyd; second: Senator Caldwell; outcome: approved.)

- SB529 — Amendments to the Independent Tax Appeals Commission Act (sponsor: Blake Johnson). Cleanup and creation of a small-claims track for tax appeals; DFA advised no state revenue impact. Committee voted to advance. (Motion: Senator Boyd; second: Senator Petty; outcome: approved.)

- HB1274 — Requires county collectors to respond within three business days to title companies requesting real-estate tax payoff figures; if the collector does not respond, the collector must still accept real-estate taxes without requiring related personal-property taxes. Sponsor said collectors and the Association of Counties supported the technical fix. Committee voted to pass. (Motion: Senator Hester; second: Senator Boyd; outcome: approved.)

- SB494 — Arkansas Tobacco Control permit consolidation (sponsor: Joshua Bridal/ATC). Consolidates multiple manufacturer permits and eliminates a cross-tier “vapor product” permit the agency said was inconsistent with the three-tier distribution system. Committee voted to advance. (Motion: Senator Boyd; second: Senator Petty; outcome: approved.)

- SB495 — Tobacco-invoice requirements and unpaid-tax valuation clarifications (sponsor: ATC). Requires permitted buyer and seller permit numbers and permitted physical addresses on invoices; when invoices or manufacturer prices are unavailable for seized products, auditors may use comparable permitted prices to compute unpaid excise tax. Committee advanced the bill. (Motion: Senator Boyd; second: Senator Petty; outcome: approved.)

- SB530 — Economic-development tax-credit proposal for a large industrial project (sponsor: Brianne Davis). Sponsor described a major capital investment and job retention package; DFA and AEDC explained a cost-benefit process and the statutory option for the state to buy back credits at 80% if credits are authorized. The committee approved the measure. (Motion: Senator Boyd; second: Senator Hester; outcome: approved.)

- SB529 and HB1274 (procedural/administrative measures) and other agency bills were advanced by the committee on unanimous or voice votes; where roll call was recorded the transcript shows affirmative committee action.

Also advanced: household- and veteran-related property-tax fixes. HB1072 (clarifying eligibility for property-tax freeze for disabled veterans and surviving spouses) was amended in committee with technical language agreed by collectors and the Association of Counties and then passed by the committee. HB1658 (property-tax penalty relief for deployed service members, including National Guard deployments within the United States) was also approved.

What this means: Most of the bills the committee advanced are procedural, agency or narrowly targeted financial measures rather than broad statutory overhauls. DFA and AEDC provided fiscal scoring or modeling where relevant; sponsors emphasized limited state revenue effect or a budget-neutral presentation for SB408 and the economic-development package. The committee’s only recorded negative recommendation on Oct. 12 was the SB394 allocation measure discussed separately.