Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Deed Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thomaston museum leaders ask lawmakers to remove historic-place easement so replica Montpelier museum can be maintained more affordably
Summary
Rep. Anne Matlack asked the Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee to remove a historic-place easement attached to the deed conveying the Montpelier, the General Henry Knox Museum, arguing the easement prevents practical repairs and energy-efficiency improvements to a 1929 replica building.
Sponsor and purpose: Representative Anne Matlack (House District 43) presented LD 1264 asking the committee to authorize extinguishing Schedule B, a historic-place easement attached to the deed that conveyed the Montpelier (General Henry Knox Museum) to the Friends of Montpelier. Matlack said the easement was not part of the original legislative conveyance and was added administratively by the Bureau of Parks and Lands; the Friends now say the easement'which invokes National Park Service standards'makes routine maintenance and energy-efficiency upgrades cost prohibitive.
Witnesses and facts: Barry Hodge, chairman of the museum board of trustees, told the committee the 2/3-scale replica of Henry Knox's Montpelier was built in 1929 and given to the state in 1965; the building is not the original structure and is not individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places (it is within the Thomaston Historic District). Hodge and the Friends asked that Schedule B (the historic-place easement) be removed so they can replace failing elements (porch, balustrade, windows) with durable, energy-efficient materials that replicate the historic appearance without incurring excessive cost.
Agency notes and legal path: Director Andy Cutchin (Bureau of Parks and Lands, referenced in testimony) previously told supporters the Bureau could remove the easement but recommended legislative action instead; Matlack said the Attorney General's office advised removal could be done via legislative action because the easement was appended after the original statute conveying the property.
Committee questions and context: Committee members asked whether the replica building or the site is a registered historic place and whether removal of the easement would undercut preservation standards; supporters emphasized the building is a replica and that the friends have no plans to sell or subdivide the property. Supporters emphasized the museum'which holds Knox family artifacts and serves educational programs'faces urgent maintenance needs before a 2030 centennial.
Ending: The committee closed the public hearing and asked the sponsor and the Bureau to be prepared to discuss statutory language in work session; testimony and submitted attachments included the original 1999 statute and the deed with Schedule B.
