House committee approves bill to guide local equestrian zones, signage and crossings

Senate Bill 25‑149, sponsored in the House by Representative Tammy Ferre, moved out of the Transportation, Housing and Local Government Committee on a favorable recommendation after testimony from equestrians and supporters.

The bill would direct state guidance to local governments on creating equestrian zones, signage design and educational efforts that promote a “pass wide and slow” approach when motorists encounter horses. Representative Ferre told the committee the bill is constituent‑led and intended to help municipalities “formulate their own policies around equestrian infrastructure, equestrian signage” rather than impose mandates.

“I'm here today to support this bill, which will help us to preserve the presence of equines in urban and suburban areas,” testified Fran Evers, saying signage and education are meant to reduce collisions and increase safety for riders and motorists. Evers said equestrian zones were identified through mapping work with Jefferson County that located concentrated equestrian activity.

Karen Hirsch, who said she represents Community Equestrian and worked with Senator Dougherty and Representative Ferre on the measure, described losing nearby barns as metro development intensified and said the bill helps preserve access so “it is safer to be an equestrian” in growing communities.

Supporters also told the committee the horse industry contributes to Colorado’s economy and provides therapeutic services. Mike Rolick, a resident who said he supports the bill, called the measure “a balance between state and local governance” and said including equestrian considerations in comprehensive plans would make local planning more consistent.

Committee members asked whether the measure would force riders to use a particular side of the road. Committee testimony noted existing Colorado law historically required equestrians to ride against traffic, but stakeholders recommended giving the rider discretion about which side is safest. Karen Hirsch said the bill has been amended to permit choice of side where appropriate.

Representatives also asked whether private property rights or liability would change; witnesses and the sponsor said the bill is not intended to create new liability for property owners or stables and that it explicitly respects property rights.

After the discussion, Representative Paschal moved Senate Bill 25‑149 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation.

The committee recorded a favorable vote and advanced the measure by tally; the committee clerk reported the motion passed by roll call. (Tally recorded by committee: yes 9, no 3.)

The measure as presented provides guidance and model language for local governments and would leave adoption and implementation decisions to cities and counties rather than imposing statewide mandates.