Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics And Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioner raises conflicts and disclosure concerns about Miami Design Preservation League; board to return with reforms and new leadership

2845605 · April 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members and MDPL representatives discussed allegations that MDPL leadership failed to register lobbying activity and accepted developer donations before advocacy positions; MDPL said its executive director resigned and the board will return with organizational reforms and new leadership.

Commissioner Suarez presented concerns about the Miami Design Preservation League’s (MDPL) advocacy practices, alleging failures to register lobbying activity, undisclosed donor relationships with developers, and possible conflicts where donations preceded policy position changes.

Nina Weberworth, MDPL vice chair, told the committee that the executive director, Daniel Ciraldo, had resigned effective March 30 and represented the board at the meeting. Weberworth acknowledged the organization’s long history and said the board would work transparently with the city to address governance and disclosure issues.

Commissioners and MDPL board members discussed examples cited by the commissioner: (1) a $5,000 contribution from a digital‑kiosk company (Ike) followed by a change in MDPL’s public position; (2) donations from hotel or developer interests preceding advocacy positions on specific projects; and (3) inconsistent registration as a lobbyist before land‑use and historic‑preservation hearings. The presenter cited city code Section 2‑482 regarding lobbying registration requirements.

Officials including the mayor and other commissioners urged collaboration to create clearer policies. The committee recorded the MDPL presentation and asked MDPL to return when new leadership and proposed organizational reforms are in place; commissioners suggested a follow‑up in roughly three months or when appropriate.