Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surplus Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss hiring contractor to manage county surplus sales; no action taken
Summary
Court debated options to manage surplus equipment sales — a per-project contractor, auction services and bidding thresholds — and deferred action to a later meeting.
The Wichita County Commissioners Court discussed options for handling surplus county equipment and property sales, including hiring a part-time contractor on a per-project basis, contracting an auctioneer, or continuing ad hoc in‑house handling. No formal action was taken.
Commissioner Beachum recounted conversations with Daryl Schoat, a former county employee who now helps with auctions; Schoat told court he would consider short-term, per-project work to assemble and coordinate items for sale. Commissioners and staff discussed compensation structures (hourly, 1099, or percentage of sale), the administrative burden of photographing and palletizing lots for online auction platforms, and whether using Purple Wave or Renne Bates would be preferable.
County staff warned that procurement rules could require formal bidding if a contractor’s aggregated payments exceed statutory thresholds; one staff member noted the need to monitor total contractor payments to avoid bid‑law problems. Lieutenant Wilson and other staff reported about 20 county vehicles and 15–18 seized vehicles identified for upcoming auctions; the court discussed palletizing office furniture and equipment to prepare for sales.
Commissioners agreed to bring a project plan back to a future meeting, and no contracting decision was made at this session.
