Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Driveway And Retaining Wall topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves driveway and retaining wall at 15 Overlook Street with conditions after neighbor concerns
Summary
The Architectural Review Board approved construction of an asphalt driveway with retaining walls and railings at 15 Overlook Street, contingent on detailed wall‑end returns, railing post details, transition drawings to adjacent stonework and curb/sidewalk restoration.
The Mount Vernon Architectural Review Board approved an application to add an asphalt driveway, retaining walls and railing at 15 Overlook Street, subject to conditions the board said are necessary to ensure a clean, durable streetscape and an appropriate transition to neighboring properties.
The applicant, representing Ben Pizza Properties and presented by a design professional identified as Shaheen (or Shahid in the record), said the plan would create a two‑space rear parking area accessed via a curb cut, with Liberty stone veneer retaining walls (approximately 3–4 feet high at their tallest points) and steel picket railings atop the walls. The submission included grading and drainage details; the applicant said a drain (a trench or French drain) will be placed at the bottom of the drive and that the sidewalk and curb cut would be restored per city standards.
A nearby resident, Marilyn McLean of 19 Oberlek Street, attended the hearing and raised concerns that excavation had already begun, that the neighbor’s stone wall and lawn may be affected, and that she had not been consulted. Board members and the applicant discussed the proximity of the new wall to the existing stone wall at the property line, how the new rail should terminate, and whether the new railing would read as a series of prefabricated panels. The applicant said the new railing would be a steel custom‑fabricated product embedded into the new wall; the applicant agreed to provide shop drawings and details showing posts at the ends of each railing run and a proper transition where the new wall abuts the neighbor’s wall.
The board’s approval included specific conditions: return the wall at the sidewalk edge so the finished end is detailed; add construction and finish detail showing how the new wall will transition to the existing adjacent stone wall; provide vertical post details at the end of each railing run; show the proposed material sample (Liberty stone veneer) and confirm curb‑cut and sidewalk restoration to Department of Public Works standards; and document the drainage/trench drain detail on the site plan. The applicant agreed to include those details in the resubmission package and noted that DPW requirements will govern curb/sidewalk restoration.
A motion to approve, conditioned on the listed details and corrective documentation, passed unanimously among commissioners present.
The board’s conditions aim to avoid a disjointed appearance where a new engineered wall meets older stonework and to ensure pedestrian safety and proper stormwater handling for the new driveway.
