Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Financial Disclosure Electronic Filing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mount Vernon ethics committee discusses electronic filing for financial-disclosure forms, approves minutes and enters executive session

2845337 · February 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Feb. 27 meeting the Mount Vernon Governance Ethics Committee approved minutes, discussed options to move financial-disclosure forms toward an electronic filing system (noting notarization and identity-verification issues), and voted to enter executive session.

Mount Vernon’s Governance Ethics Committee met Feb. 27 and approved the previous meeting’s minutes, discussed moving financial-disclosure statements toward an electronic filing system, and voted to go into executive session.

The committee called the roll and established a quorum before taking up routine business. A motion to accept the minutes from the prior meeting was made, seconded and approved, with the chair announcing that "the ayes have it."

Committee members spent the bulk of the discussion on whether and how to allow electronic filing of financial-disclosure statements. Members said they planned to work with the deputy clerk to explore options. The discussion focused on two technical and legal issues: proof of identity and the current notarization language in the form. Committee members noted the form as written requires notarization, and that language would need amending or an alternative method of proving identity would have to be approved before fully switching to an online system.

A committee member proposed a staged approach: begin by creating a fillable PDF so filers can type entries and print legible copies for submission, then work toward a fuller electronic submission process. Members also discussed the possibility of staff assisting filers at a physical office to verify identity, underscoring that, for the current year, the committee expected to retain hard-copy submissions while pursuing electronic options.

The committee noted the topic had been raised previously at a prior meeting and described the current discussion as an initial step to identify mechanics and legal questions rather than to adopt an immediate policy change. Following the discussion, a member moved and another seconded that the committee go into executive session; the motion was approved.

The committee did not adopt a new electronic-filing policy at the meeting, and no timetable or specific ordinance or rule changes were specified. Members said they would continue coordinating with the deputy clerk and report back when more technical or legal solutions had been developed.