Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Preservation Commission proposes two-tier tax-credit idea to encourage restorations
Summary
The Historic Preservation Commission is exploring a two-tier tax-credit structure to incentivize high-quality historic restorations rather than minimal repairs; commissioners asked staff to work on draft language and the commission to vet it before the board considers any ordinance changes.
The Bel Air Historic Preservation Commission has proposed studying a two-tier tax-credit system to give larger incentives for full restorations rather than minimal repairs, the board heard on April 1.
The matter is relevant because it could alter how owners of properties in the town’s historic program are financially incentivized to restore architectural features. A speaker who serves as the board’s liaison to the Historic Preservation Commission described the concept: the town’s current program offers a single 10% tax credit for qualifying work, and the commission is considering an added tier that would provide a larger incentive for projects that restore a property “back in time” rather than perform only minimal preservation work.
The liaison explained the commission’s thinking: the commission would exercise discretion and rely on its expertise, including historical photographs and material analysis, when judging whether a proposed project meets the higher standard for the larger credit. The board heard examples of the kinds of work that might qualify for the enhanced tier: restoring historical roofing types, historically accurate windows or siding, or other treatments that more closely match the property’s original appearance.
Commissioners and staff discussed implementation questions, including whether the change would require an ordinance amendment or could be implemented through resolution, how to define restoration versus repair, and how the commission’s review process would rely on its technical expertise. Planning staff and legal counsel were asked to collaborate with the Historic Preservation Commission on draft language. If the HPC approves draft language, commissioners were told representatives would present the proposal at a future work session for the board’s consideration.
No formal change to the town code was adopted at the session; the board asked staff to continue drafting language and to coordinate with the HPC for future review.
