Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Udo topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planner flags about 500 edits to Clayton Unified Development Ordinance; draft summary expected in May
Summary
Planning commissioners were told Mary Stroder of Banning Engineering has recorded roughly 500 suggested edits to Clayton’s Unified Development Ordinance and will categorize them for the commission to review, with a condensed packet expected by the May meeting.
At a Town of Clayton Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission member Doug said Mary Stroder, a planner with Banning Engineering, had made about 500 notes on the town’s Unified Development Ordinance and was working to categorize and condense those comments for the commission to review, with a condensed package likely not ready until the May meeting.
The notes address practical inconsistencies between the UDO text and local practice, Doug said, citing examples such as a 3-by-5 sign-size limit in the ordinance that does not match existing business signs and a provision that references assisted-living facilities but not nursing homes. “She told me last week that she had made about 500 notes on our current UDO,” Doug said. “She’s trying to work on condensing those notes.”
The commission discussed how the document was created several years ago by merging the subdivision control ordinance and the building ordinance into a single Unified Development Ordinance and that the combined document contains provisions that may not fit Clayton’s current needs. Commissioners said the review will look at what rules remain appropriate for Clayton — including sign dimensions, allowed uses by zone, and building standards for downtown and residential districts.
Commissioners were told the full UDO is posted on the town website under planning (townofclayton.us) and that the condensed packet Mary Stroder is preparing will be the starting point for focused edits and discussion. Doug asked members to review the packet when it is released and bring items they want to preserve or change.
Votes at a glance: the commission approved the March meeting minutes by voice vote during the session; the meeting record shows the motion was made and seconded and the minutes were accepted, but individual tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
Why it matters: the UDO sets the town’s zoning rules, allowed uses in each zone, and development standards. Commissioners said updating it to match local practice and clarify ambiguous provisions could change how new development, signs and care facilities are evaluated and permitted.
What’s next: Commissioners were told to watch for the condensed UDO notes to be posted and to prepare comments for the May meeting. The planner’s categorization is intended to create manageable topics for the commission’s review and future public discussion.
