Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Management Advisory Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners agree to launch stock‑restricted area advisory committee, expand membership
Summary
The Yakima County Board directed staff to form a Stock Restricted Area Advisory Committee, expand its membership to include more cattle-producer and tree-fruit representation, and return a formal resolution and invitation letter for commissioner approval.
Get email alerts on the Land Management Advisory Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yakima County commissioners directed staff on March 10 to move forward with forming a Stock Restricted Area Advisory Committee to make recommendations on stock-restricted boundaries. Commissioners asked staff to add membership to ensure stronger cattle-producer representation and to include a tree-fruit representative; staff will return a resolution and invitation letter to the board for formal appointment.
Staff presented a draft work plan that staff, county planning and corporate counsel had reviewed. Commissioners expressed differing emphases: some said the advisory group should have stronger representation from cattle producers given the subject matter; others said the group should also include non-cattle stakeholders, such as tree-fruit interests, to ensure multiple perspectives are heard.
Lisa (Public Services) reported outreach to cattlemen’s representatives and to the tree-fruit association. She said one producer (Angelo Manning) had agreed to participate and that John Devaney from the tree-fruit association offered a staff member to serve. Commissioners discussed two options: keep the original design (seven members and two alternates) or expand membership; they agreed to expand to nine members to improve stakeholder balance and to allow for alternates drawn from identified contacts.
The board directed staff to prepare a resolution formally appointing the membership, and to draft a board letter inviting the selected participants and setting a meeting schedule. Commissioners expressed a desired timeline: begin the work before summer and report progress to the board; staff will return with a formal resolution for appointment and a meeting schedule.
No formal vote was required on the work plan during this session; the action taken was direction to staff to move the process forward and to return a formal resolution for the board’s consideration.
