Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council removes Raven Lane master-street connection after land-trust acquisition and bridge-cost concerns
Summary
Fayetteville City Council approved an amendment removing a planned 0.2-mile residential link on Raven Lane from the master street plan, citing large bridge costs, floodplain and land-trust conservation interests and limited feasibility.
The Fayetteville City Council voted to amend the city’s master street plan to remove a roughly 0.2-mile planned residential link that would have extended Raven Lane across Clabber (Claver) Creek toward the Crystal Springs area.
Development Services Director Jonathan Kurth told the council the segment has long been on master plans (originally proposed in 1995) but is now constrained by substantial floodplain, the presence of environmentally sensitive riparian corridor, the Northwest Arkansas Land Trust’s acquisition of roughly half the corridor and steep bridge cost estimates from a 2019 engineering study. Kurth said the channelization option in 2019 was estimated about $2.3 million and a spanning bridge about $3.0 million; staff said both figures are almost certainly higher in 2025.
Robert Rhodes, attorney for Craig and Laura Underwood and for the Northwest Arkansas Land Trust, urged removal of the connection, saying a bridge would cut through land trust property and run counter to tree-preservation easements on the site. Rhodes said neighbors backing the removal and that the land trust’s conservation goals and the presence of an environmentally sensitive species would be harmed by a road through the riparian corridor.
Opponents at the podium emphasized that keeping the master-street line preserves future connectivity. Kyle Smith, a nearby resident, recounted decades of planning history and urged the council to keep the connection as an “intent” to avoid circumventing the plan via private conservation. John McGuire and other public commenters argued the floodplain and riparian values supported removal.
Kurth said staff balanced connectivity needs — noting it would be nearly a mile between Dean Solomon and Salem roads — against conservation, development patterns in Crystal Springs and high construction costs, and recommended removal. Planning Commission and the Transportation Committee had forwarded the request in favor (planning commission 6–3 split). The council voted to amend the master street plan and remove the Raven Lane segment.
Council members discussed whether removal would preclude future pedestrian/trail connections; Kurth said removing the link does not guarantee trails or alternative connections and that adding a trail later would require its own planning and approvals. The council recorded the motion and passed the amendment by roll-call vote.
