Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Elections staff propose written adjudication policy, two-database workflow and staffing changes to speed up election-night counts
Summary
Summit County elections staff outlined a plan to decentralize some ballot-adjudication tasks to IT staff under board-approved written guidelines, create two databases for unofficial reporting, remake certain UOCAVA ballots on paper, and expand upload capacity to reduce bottlenecks on election night.
Summit County elections staff presented a series of proposed changes to ballot adjudication and election-night workflows designed to reduce bottlenecks, shorten recount and audit workload and speed unofficial results reporting.
Staff proposed three main changes: (1) a written adjudication policy, modeled on Cuyahoga County’s manual, that would give staff a board-approved “recipe” for routine adjudication decisions; (2) delegating day-to-day adjudication tasks to IT and absentee staff teams (including bipartisan reviewers) under that written policy while reserving high-stakes voter-intent questions for the board; and (3) using two databases during the pre-certification period — an “unofficial canvas” database with full, white-glove adjudication, and a “last call” database to collect late or Monday/Tuesday batches that would be merged into the unofficial…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
