Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Elections staff propose written adjudication policy, two-database workflow and staffing changes to speed up election-night counts

2840468 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Summit County elections staff outlined a plan to decentralize some ballot-adjudication tasks to IT staff under board-approved written guidelines, create two databases for unofficial reporting, remake certain UOCAVA ballots on paper, and expand upload capacity to reduce bottlenecks on election night.

Summit County elections staff presented a series of proposed changes to ballot adjudication and election-night workflows designed to reduce bottlenecks, shorten recount and audit workload and speed unofficial results reporting.

Staff proposed three main changes: (1) a written adjudication policy, modeled on Cuyahoga County’s manual, that would give staff a board-approved “recipe” for routine adjudication decisions; (2) delegating day-to-day adjudication tasks to IT and absentee staff teams (including bipartisan reviewers) under that written policy while reserving high-stakes voter-intent questions for the board; and (3) using two databases during the pre-certification period — an “unofficial canvas” database with full, white-glove adjudication, and a “last call” database to collect late or Monday/Tuesday batches that would be merged into the unofficial…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans