Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appellate arguments split over whether trial judge should have given ‘courtesy’ jury instruction in Walker case
Summary
At oral argument, defense counsel said jury questions signaled a likely deadlock and the trial court erred by not giving a courtesy instruction; state attorneys countered the record shows no deadlock and say the original charge already included the pattern instruction.
An appellate court heard competing arguments about whether the trial court in Shelby County erred by failing to give a so‑called courtesy instruction after jurors sent notes asking about premeditation and unanimity.
The defense argued the jury’s notes—including that it was “unsure how to define judgment as it reflects to premeditation” and a later question asking, “If the jurors cannot agree on the first count … must we then all agree on a unanimous not guilty plea before moving to the lesser included offense?”—showed the panel was struggling toward a deadlock and that the trial court should have given a courtesy instruction designed to protect minority jurors from yielding to the majority. “Unanimous jury verdicts are probably at the very top,” defense counsel said, arguing the omission amounted to plain error that could…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

