Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter warns safe-routes bill could bring red-light cameras and costs to local neighborhood
Summary
During the joint committee hearing on HB235 (Safe Routes to Schools), a resident raised concerns about red-light cameras, local notice, and the use of citation revenue to fund camera deployment.
A resident speaking during the joint committee on Ways and Means and Judiciary’s session on April 1 criticized aspects of House Bill 235, a measure with a title referencing safe routes to schools, saying the bill could lead to installation of red-light cameras in the speaker’s district and impose costs on local residents.
Why it matters: Public commenters can highlight local impacts that committees may not have heard from area residents before a measure advances. In this case the commenter urged the committees to consider local notice and tradeoffs between traffic enforcement revenue and other community environmental needs.
What the commenter said: The resident said local residents had not been notified that the bill was being considered and that the proposed deployment of red-light cameras would increase traffic enforcement in the area. The speaker said DOT plans to install roughly 80 cameras over 10 years at a projected cost of $40 million and argued that those funds could instead address environmental needs, citing an example of cleaning roughly 400 cesspools on the North Shore rather than funding cameras.
Committee action: After the public comment, committee members moved forward and the committee recorded a vote to pass HB235 unamended as part of the joint session’s agenda; the transcript records the measure as adopted.
Ending: The committee’s vote advances HB235; the committee did not amend the bill based on the comment on April 1, and the speaker’s concerns were noted in the hearing record.
