Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Probation Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Probation reports staffing shifts, diversion caseloads and institution counts
Summary
San Mateo County Probation updated commissioners on leadership reassignments, diversion numbers, and juvenile‑hall census.
San Mateo County Probation briefed the commission March 25 on recent staff changes, diversion activity and institution population counts, and described efforts to standardize monthly data reporting to the commission.
Deputy Chief Jahan Clark said probation leadership is shifting roles: Emonier Wade has taken the deputy‑chief role over institutions, Becky Powers is returning to juvenile services as assistant deputy chief, and Yvonne Bustos will be promoted to superintendent of the juvenile hall effective the end of the month. Clark said those reassignments explain the larger staff presence at the meeting.
Nora Dawn, assistant deputy chief for juvenile services, gave unit statistics: 163 youth were in the court diversion process, 83 were on supervision, for a combined total the meeting cited as 346 clients across diversion and supervision. The institution population was 35 youth, including four out‑of‑county placements (two from Santa Clara County and two from San Francisco County). The EMP unit had 20 youth (15 males, five females). Dawn also read a racial breakdown present in the report: 26 Hispanic, two African American, one Polynesian, two Asian and one multiracial youth in the reported cohort.
Probation staff described work to increase city‑led diversion. Deputy Chief Clark said existing city diversion partnerships include San Mateo and South City and that Atherton and other jurisdictions have discussed early‑stage programs; probation described an embedded probation officer in San Mateo city programs and said it offers technical support to cities seeking to expand diversion opportunities.
On data reporting, Clark said probation staff are reviewing an earlier template used by commission members and will produce a department‑approved monthly data sheet intended to align with internal databases and minimize ad‑hoc data requests. The department expects to present a draft of that template to the commission in coming months.
Why it matters: Staffing and program‑delivery shifts influence county capacity for diversion, in‑custody services and reentry; commissioners asked whether the county can scale city‑led diversion and how inspection and reporting schedules should align with school calendars and fiscal reporting.
Probation invited commissioners to sign up for inspection teams and said the department is coordinating with the commission on inspection timing.
