Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Parents’ language-access dispute raised during termination argument; panel questioned waiver and colloquy

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In a termination appeal, the court examined whether a Spanish‑speaking mother knowingly waived an interpreter and whether the trial judge should have performed a statutory colloquy to ensure any waiver was knowing and voluntary before relying on testimony for credibility findings.

The panel heard argument in Department of Children and Families & Others v. Mother, docket 24P705 (partially impounded), focusing on whether the trial judge erred by failing to conduct an on-the-record colloquy when the mother—identified as a native Spanish speaker at trial—electively testified in English with an interpreter on standby.

Appellant counsel Anna Maria Gioia argued the record shows the mother repeatedly needed interpretation, that the interpreter sometimes rendered…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans