Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HEB ISD presents early‑literacy and district benchmark reports; staff explains assessment changes
Summary
District staff reported early literacy measures (DIBELS/Lectura) and district benchmark assessment (DBA) results for grades K–10, and explained why comparisons across years are limited because of a one‑year interim assessment change the district later reversed.
HEB ISD staff presented an early‑literacy Measures of Instruction (MOI) report and district benchmark assessment (DBA) results on March 25, describing grade‑level performance patterns and explaining a recent return to the district‑authored DBA after one year of interim assessments.
Dr. Norgard, who presented the early literacy report, described the instruments in current use: DIBELS for English fluency and Lectura for Spanish; the district also uses BASC for English comprehension and the SEL assessment for Spanish comprehension. Dr. Norgard explained that kindergarten cohorts typically show a midyear dip in comprehension measures as assessment targets change from book handling skills to reading behaviors, and that year‑over‑year comparisons must account for cohort differences.
On district benchmarks, staff said the district piloted TEA interims in the Cambium platform for one year, then returned to an internally authored DBA delivered in the same Cambium platform. Staff told trustees that interim assessments produced “inflated” meets/masters values compared with historical patterns and that the district returned to its DBA so teachers could have consistent, locally controlled measures while retaining platform parity with STAAR‑style delivery and accommodations.
Staff noted that for some cohorts DBA performance on approaches was similar to historical patterns, while meets and masters required targeted intervention. For English I and II, staff flagged that composition scoring and alignment of teacher grading with STAAR outcomes will be studied further because masters‑level performance showed the largest shifts.
Why it matters: The reports inform instruction and intervention decisions for the coming months and the district’s accountability reporting. Staff cautioned trustees against direct year‑to‑year comparisons when the underlying assessment instrument changed.
What’s next: Staff will monitor cohort growth, refine intervention plans for students near the meets threshold, and study grading and scoring alignment for high‑school composition tasks to ensure teacher scoring aligns with future STAAR performance.
