Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Deed Restrictions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise deed‑restriction enforcement concerns and allege council interference during public comments
Summary
During public comment at the April 1 meeting, residents criticized a neighbor’s construction in a single‑family area, cited a 1975 deed‑restriction covenant and court orders, and accused council members of intervening; council rules on campaigning and decorum were also invoked during a heated exchange.
Several Pasadena residents used the April 1 public‑comment period to press the council on deed‑restriction enforcement and alleged political interference in a neighborhood dispute.
Ralph Morrissey told the council that deed restrictions for Fairmont Estates were established in 1975 and that homeowners “automatically agreed to follow them when buying a home.” He said one neighbor, identified in the remarks as Mr. Alvarez, constructed a two‑story apartment building in a single‑family neighborhood, ignored city notices and court orders and now faces contempt‑of‑court proceedings. "He faces contempt of court charges with the threat of getting fined or jail time if he doesn't comply," Morrissey said.
Alan Fowler, speaking later on the same topic, criticized council members who he said had intervened in the neighborhood dispute. Fowler said he had tried to raise concerns directly and objected to council members he named for supporting the neighbor in the case. He also said there had been a lack of engagement with some residents before council members inserted themselves in the dispute.
A different speaker during public comment asserted that city leaders had used government resources against his family and disputed limits on campaigning during the public‑comment period; a mayoral point of order was called and council rules against campaigning from the podium were cited by staff.
Why it matters: Deed restrictions and the enforcement of court orders affect property use and neighborhood character. Residents said the dispute has progressed into court, and they urged the council to respect local process and neighbors’ rights.
What the meeting record shows: Morrissey described the deed restrictions and the court process; he accused two councilmembers (Manny Guerrero and Rolando Ibero, as named in his remarks) of siding with the noncompliant property owner. The transcript contains public accusations but does not include new council action, formal enforcement votes or staff reports at this meeting tied to the dispute.
Ending: The record shows strong resident concern and accusations during public comment; the transcript does not show a council motion directing staff to take a specific new enforcement action during this meeting.
